Samenvatting

The implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was the outcome of a long journey of nuclear disputes leading to the normalization of relations between Iran and the international community. This landmark agreement seems the first to have brought together historical antagonists to conclude in a compromise. The purpose of this dissertation is to analyse this nuclear deal to
determine whether the policy is effective in various criteria. In doing so, the outcome of the research can determine whether the policy needs modifications or to be ceased. The central question of analysis was: Were the objectives of the JCPOA met? In order to answer this question, an evaluative policy analysis was conducted based on four criteria: Effectiveness, Responsiveness, Equity, and Adequacy.
Research demonstrates that even though the policy encompasses weaknesses, the negotiators interests were taken into account, the nuclear issue with Iran is solved, and the goals of the policy were met. Additionally, the policy creates economic benefits. Moreover, concerns for a “sneak out” scenario or a
nuclear arms race do not seem as legitimate as what has been claimed by the existing literature. However, research does demonstrate that the policy does not accomplish success in all four criteria. Where Effectiveness, Responsiveness, and Adequacy are sufficiently present, Equity falls behind. Therefore, it is suggested that the policy should improve on Equity. However, overall, the JCPOA presents a successful policy that should be upheld.