De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk

Terug naar zoekresultatenDeel deze publicatie

Defining war rape

a comparative case study of natural and codified International Criminal Law

Open access

Rechten:

Defining war rape

a comparative case study of natural and codified International Criminal Law

Open access

Rechten:

Samenvatting

This paper focuses on the criticism that tribunals such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)2, by virtue of their reliance on customary law and other methods of determining existing norms, appear to violate the principle of legality. Two main questions will be addressed. First, whether the tribunals fail to conduct a fair trial by neglecting the principle of legality, and secondly, whether this use of a different substantive International Criminal Law compared to the International Criminal Court (ICC), affects the effectiveness of the international criminal justice system.

OrganisatieHogeschool Leiden
OpleidingHBO-Rechten
AfdelingFaculteit M&B
Gepubliceerd inStrathclyde Law Review Vol. 5, Uitgave: 1, Pagina's: 37-47
Jaar2022
TypeArtikel
TaalEngels

Op de HBO Kennisbank vind je publicaties van 26 hogescholen

De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk