De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk

Terug naar zoekresultatenDeel deze publicatie

Two ways of leaving

a comparative case study on exit strategies of a UN and a NATO led mission

Rechten: Alle rechten voorbehouden

Two ways of leaving

a comparative case study on exit strategies of a UN and a NATO led mission

Rechten: Alle rechten voorbehouden

Samenvatting

In crisis areas, military and civilian missions are often simultaneously active, but they have different mandates and are executed by different organisations. Also the way those organisations leave a country after an intervention differs. This article provides a comparison between the military (ISAF/NTM-A) and political (UNAMA) mission in Afghanistan. In 2009, both missions designed their exit strategy as transition-oriented. In practice, however, the military and political exit strategies were operationalised differently. Interviews with employees of both organisations reveal UNAMA being more process (Afghan led and Afghan owned) oriented and ISAF being more project-oriented.

OrganisatieNederlandse Defensie Academie
OpleidingFaculteit Militaire Wetenschappen
Gepubliceerd inNetherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2015. The Dilemma of Leaving: Political and Military Exit Strategies / Jörg Noll, Daan van den Wollenberg, Frans Osinga, Georg Frerks, Irene van Kemenade editors T.M.C. Asser Press / Springer, The Hague, Pagina's: 217-245
Jaar2016
TypeBoekdeel
ISBN978-94-6265-077-0
TaalEngels

Op de HBO Kennisbank vind je publicaties van 26 hogescholen

De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk