The perception of shared decision-making in hematology by patients and physicians seems satisfactory, but important steps are still ahead of us
The perception of shared decision-making in hematology by patients and physicians seems satisfactory, but important steps are still ahead of us
Samenvatting
Patients with a hematologic malignancy increasingly prefer to be actively involved in treatment decision-making.1,2 Shared decision-making (SDM), a process that supports decision-making in preference-sensitive decisions, fits well with this need. A decision is preference sensitive when well-informed patients considerably differ in their trade-offs between the pros and cons of one option, or if more equal treatment options are available, including no treatment. SDM involves several steps: the first is choice talk, where the professional informs the patient that a decision needs to be made between the various relevant options and that the patient's opinion is important. The second is option talk, where the professional explains the options and their pros and cons. In the third step, preference talk, the professional and the patient discuss the patient's preferences. The professional supports the patient in deliberation. The final step is decision talk, where the professional and patient discuss the patient's decisional role preference, make or defer the decision and discuss possible follow-up.3,4
Organisatie | Zuyd Hogeschool |
Afdeling | Faculteit Gezondheidszorg |
Lectoraat | Lectoraat Autonomie en Participatie van Chronisch Zieken |
Gepubliceerd in | HemaSphere Vol. 4, Uitgave: 4 |
Datum | 2020-05-14 |
Type | Artikel |
DOI | 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000417 |
Taal | Engels |